step one. Yet ,, within the genealogy and family history, everyone knowthat for every code there was a different. A good vexing section ofgenealogy would be the fact no-one extremely knows exactly how to utilize this new exclusions orrules which have people definitive adjective particularly usually, possibly, probably,more than likely, etcetera. It might be interesting if the indeed there almost every other examples ofjointures being generated annually or one or two immediately following a well-known relationships go out.

2. Could there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation on matrimony off ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who have been third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise next cousins, immediately after taken off the fresh new 5th LordClifford? Who does restrict their wedding big date.

Arthur

Presumably, in the event that an excellent dispensation are looked for and you may offered, it can havebeen of the among the many adopting the, and might can be found in new correspondingregister guide, when it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop away from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop away from Carlisle 1509-1520

5. In the event your tenth Lord Clifford does marry during the early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth later in that 12 months, do the latest chronology perhaps not works?

John fingers?

Elizabeth produced during the later 1487, Henry produced in the 1488/nine, Joan into the ,etcetera. filling out new names of post of . If (a) thechronology however really works; and you will (b) their unique wedding piece was not lowest; thenwe simply have the newest 1505 pedigree off Henry VII’s that is during the oppositionto the new supposition you to she try a valid child.

6. Regarding your 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Were there someone else? If so,won’t one mirror defectively with this document since a resource?

Away from comparisons You will find produced from the fresh new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the 1480-1500 Visitation of the Northern pedigrees, that are

From the c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, the brand new Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin good Clifford pedigree, but instead in the St. John pedigree. While the I’mnot accustomed the brand new St. John family relations, following the ‘s the information asit looks regarding c.1505 pedigree, as the obtained from the latest 1834 Coll. Better. etGen. blog post. This new phrasing inside the quotations is strictly because it appears inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Of my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset had about three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Woman the fresh King’s Mom.” that has “The fresh Queen.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first husband.” she had 3 daus & 2 sons:

A beneficial. “Edith, wedded to help you Geoffrey Pole out-of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married towards the Woman Margaret, dau. regarding theDuke away from Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[a new youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four children:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.”B4. “An excellent Nun out-of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you will sistren.” That have Honduran mladenka issueindicated, however named.C2. “Age, wedded in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Age, married basic to the Lord Zouche; just after on LordScrope out-of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated although not called.

Margaret Duchess of Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. off K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”